Risk 1% and the Bad Days Stop Mattering
Risk about 1% of your account per trade, meaning a trade that hits its stop loses 1% of the account — not that 1% goes into the position. Position size comes from account size, that 1%, and the distance to a stop set by the chart. At 1%, eight straight losses cost roughly 8%.
Most traders do not blow up on one catastrophic trade. They blow up on eight ordinary ones in a row, each slightly too big, taken while trying to get the last one back.
The fix is unglamorous and it is arithmetic: risk about 1% of your account on any single trade.
That one rule does more for a trading account than any entry technique, and it is the rule most people skip — because it feels like it slows them down.
What does "risk 1%" actually mean?
It does not mean putting 1% of your account into a position. That is a different number and confusing the two is where most of the damage starts.
It means: if this trade goes to your stop, you lose 1% of your account.
So on a $10,000 account, a losing trade costs you $100. Not $100 of position — $100 of account. The position itself might be far larger than $100, and that is fine, because position size is an output of the calculation, not an input.
Three things decide it:
- Your account size.
- The percentage you are willing to lose — 1%.
- The distance from your entry to your stop, which comes from the chart.
Those three give you the position size. There is no fourth input called “how confident I feel.”
The consequence people miss: a tighter stop means a bigger position, not a smaller one. If your invalidation is close, you can hold more and still only risk 1%. If the chart demands a wide stop, you take a smaller position. The risk stays constant while the size moves around it.
Position sizing and stops, worked through on live charts:
Why 1% and not 5%?
Run the numbers on a losing streak, because you will have one. Everyone does.
At 1% per trade, eight losses in a row costs you roughly 8% of the account. Unpleasant. Survivable. You are still trading, still thinking clearly, still able to take the next setup properly.
At 5% per trade, the same eight losses cost you about a third of everything. Now you are not making trading decisions any more — you are making recovery decisions, which are different and worse. You size up to make it back. You take marginal setups because you need one to work.
The account damage is the smaller half of the problem. The real cost is that losing a third of your capital changes how you behave for weeks.
1% is not conservative. It is the size at which a normal losing streak stays normal.
The part nobody mentions: your stop is not where it hurts
The stop goes where the chart says the idea is dead. Not where you become uncomfortable.
If you put a stop at the point where the loss feels tolerable, you will be stopped out of trades that were still working, over and over, and you will conclude the market is hunting you. It is not. You are placing your invalidation somewhere the market has no reason to respect.
Correct order, always:
- Where does the chart say I am wrong? → that is the stop
- What is 1% of my account? → that is the risk
- Divide → that is the position size
If step 3 gives you a position that feels too small to bother with, the honest answer is usually that the stop is too far away and the trade is not worth taking. That is useful information, not a problem to be engineered around by moving the stop closer.
What this protects you from
The trade that gaps. Occasionally price will jump straight through your stop and you will lose more than planned. At 1% that is annoying. At 5% it can be most of a month.
Yourself, on a bad day. Some days you should not be trading. Sized properly, a bad decision on one of those days costs 1%. Sized badly, it can cost the quarter.
The run of losses that follows a run of wins. Confidence after a good week is the most expensive feeling in trading, because it arrives right when you are most likely to size up.
What it does not do
It does not make you profitable. A losing strategy risking 1% loses money slowly instead of quickly.
Risk management is not an edge. It is what keeps you at the table long enough for an edge to show up — and long enough to find out whether you have one at all. Those are both worth having.
Try this before your next trade
Work out, in actual money, what 1% of your account is. Write it down.
Then look at your last ten trades and ask: did any of them lose more than that number?
If the answer is yes, that is the thing to fix this week. Not your entries. Not your indicators. The size.
Common questions
How much should you risk per trade?
About 1% of the account. On a $10,000 account, a trade that goes to its stop costs $100 of account. The position itself can be far larger than $100, because position size is an output of the calculation, not an input.
Why risk 1% per trade instead of 5%?
Because everyone has losing streaks. Eight losses in a row at 1% costs roughly 8% of the account; at 5% it costs about a third. Losing a third of your capital pushes you into recovery decisions — sizing up, taking marginal setups — and changes how you behave for weeks.
How do you calculate position size?
Find where the chart says the idea is dead: that is the stop. Work out 1% of the account: that is the risk. Divide the two to get the position size — a tighter stop allows a bigger position, a wider stop means a smaller one, and the risk stays constant.
Does the 1 percent rule make you profitable?
No. A losing strategy risking 1% loses money slowly instead of quickly. Risk management is not an edge; it keeps you at the table long enough for an edge to show up, and long enough to find out whether you have one.
Want the full checklist?
The two strategies and the checklists behind them are taught step by step in the course — including the rules for when to stay out.
Get the weekly newsletter
Craig’s weekly read on the market, with that week’s two new articles in it. No price predictions, no hype. Unsubscribe whenever.